Common Violations of the FDCPA
Illinois personal injury attorneys who specialize in consumer law can help you ensure your rights are protected according to the FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act). Debt Collection abuse is all-too common, and definitely on the rise in these difficult financial times. Chicago personal injury lawyers say it’s important you know how to recognize common violations of the FDCPA on the part of debt collectors.
Here are some of the major provisions of the FDCPA, according to our own Chicago personal injury and consumer law attorney:
Addition of Unauthorized Amounts of Debt: Debt collectors and collection attorneys sometimes add amounts to the debt that have not been authorized (such as fees or service charges to dishonored checks). Any addition of fees or service charges, without compliance with state law concerning notification of dishonored check and limits on the charge, is illegal. Also, the addition of collection costs and/or attorney’s fees when not provided for by the contract or law is illegal.
Mass-Mailing of Attorney Letters: Collection letters sent on the letterhead of an attorney or over the facsimile signature of an attorney often violate the Act. The attorney must review the creditor’s file, reach a professional determination of the merits of the case, and participate in the decision to mail the collection letter. In a mass-mailing situation the attorney’s participation does not reach this level.
Threats of Action That Cannot Be Legally Taken or Not Intended to Be Taken: Collection letters that threaten a lawsuit, wage garnishment, seizure of property, etc. often are threats of unintended action. The law provides that neither the collector nor the attorney may overstate the remedies available to the creditor. Where the amount of the debt is small or the consumer has little or no assets, the threat of a collection action is usually false. In almost all circumstances threats of arrest for nonpayment of the debt are also false.
Suit Filed in an Improper Venue: When an attorney attempting to collect a debt files suit in a venue other than where the consumer resides or where the contract was signed, the Act may be violated. The Act limits suits regarding real estate to the jurisdiction where the land is located. For personal debts, a collection action may be filed only where the consumer resides or where the contract was signed.
Communications with Third Parties: The collector may not communicate regarding the debt with anyone other than the consumer, his or her attorney, a consumer reporting agency, the creditor, and the creditor’s and consumer’s attorneys. Contact with the consumer’s employer or co-workers may violate the Act.
Contradiction or Overshadowing of the Thirty-Day Validation Notice: The collector is required to inform the consumer in the first communication or within five (5) days thereof that the consumer has thirty (30) days within which to dispute the debt, request in writing verification of the alleged debt, and/or request in writing the name and address of the original creditor. To contradict or overshadow this thirty (30) day period within which the consumer may exercise his rights violates the Act. The contradiction need not be threatening to violate the Act.Failure to Provide the Consumer Notice: The failure to give the validation notice, discussed in the foregoing paragraph, and the debt collection warning, i.e. — this is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose, violates the Act. In all subsequent communications the collector must state that the communication is from a debt collector.
If you believe your consumer rights have been violated by debt collection abuse, contact an Illinois consumer law attorney today. You do have a voice.
Popularity: 29% [?]



